District Court Enjoins Enforcement of Statute Providing for Race-Based Preferences in Federal Procurement and University Contracts; DOD Issues a Pyrrhic Waiver
The above link is to "Government Contracts Blog," March 19, 2009, and it gives a very good history and analysis on the court's decision and the DOD reaction.
A small excerpt:
"On November 4, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an opinion in Rothe Development Corporation v. Department of Defense, holding that a statute providing for race-based preferences in DOD procurements was unconstitutional."
"On March 10, 2009, DOD issued "preliminary guidance" on how the Order should be implemented. DOD advised that "any activity, which includes but is not limited to the award of contracts and orders under contracts, advance payments, and the award of grants or scholarships or the addition of funds to existing grants and scholarships, that rely exclusively on the authority of 10 U.S.C. § 2323 should cease." Beyond this, DOD encouraged individuals to consult with the attorneys in the DOD Office of General Counsel with any additional questions."
To read the section of 10 U.S.C. § 2323 that the DOD is ceasing to contract under, go here.
While this action does not specifically effect SDVOB contracting, any of you whose business would be impacted should understand why. Also, since the DOD is putting a hold on HUBzone contracts, this would be a great time to redouble your efforts in getting Contracting Officers to set aside for SDVOBs.
Another thing to keep in mind: Re-instating these programs within DOD will require legislative action. Now is the time to work together to help shape that legislation and work toward improving the SDVOB program.



Legislation